- Valerie Jarrett: 'We can't be paralyzed' by Trump's 'troubling' rhetoricPresident Obama's longest-serving senior adviser remembers iconic moments like his inauguration and meeting Trump, and shares her thoughts on the 2020 field for Democratic hopefuls.ABC News
- WWE superstar Matt Hardy responds to John Oliver's wrestling criticismWWE superstar Matt Hardy responds to criticism leveled against WWE by HBO's John Oliver during his show, 'Last Week Tonight.'FOX News
- Tapper: This is strange no matter how you slice itCNN's Jake Tapper breaks down the situation in Calexico, California, as President Trump travels to the border town for a visit.CNN
The Mueller report is complete. Now what?The Washington Post2:24
Valerie Jarrett: 'We can't be paralyzed' by Trump's 'troubling' rhetoricABC News4:37
WWE superstar Matt Hardy responds to John Oliver's wrestling criticismFOX News2:17
Tapper: This is strange no matter how you slice itCNN1:43
5 things you need to know about the upcoming Israeli electionCBS News2:51
Clyburn: Founding fathers laid out when to consider impeachmentNBC News10:53
Experts say Mar-a-Lago’s a soft target for foreign intelligenceMSNBC9:09
Obama worries progressives could potentially undermine Democratic alliesThe Washington Post2:03
American who joined ISIS wants to return homeUSA TODAY1:28
Venezuelans protest as power-struggle intensifiesAssociated Press1:14
Sudanese protesters clash with security forces outside Bashir's compoundReuters3:03
Biden makes first appearance since complaints about unwelcome touchingABC News2:25
Trump visits US-Mexico border, presses for stronger securityFOX News5:30
Biden: I'd want to be last person to announce 2020 runCNN0:55
Minnesota program may put a dent in veteran homelessnessCBS News7:10
Why Mueller team reportedly speaking against Barr summary is keyNBC News14:56
President Trump has uttered the phrase “no collusion” the past two years to pretty much anybody who would listen — more than 200 times total. And on Friday, special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s Russia investigation ended with the news that Mueller won’t be indicting anybody else. Nobody has been charged with conspiracy in working with Russia during the 2016 election, and now nobody will, at least by Mueller’s team.
Of course, Mueller’s findings have not yet been made public. Even so, some of Trump’s top surrogates are already declaring victory. Here’s the chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, Ronna McDaniel:
The whole point of the Mueller Investigation was to see if a conspiracy with Russia existed to affect the 2016 election.— Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) March 23, 2019
Dems like Adam Schiff promised otherwise, but it ended without a single American charged for colluding with Russia.
Because there was no collusion.
Without the report, though, can we really draw such conclusions? Here’s what we do know.
It has been clear for months that Mueller was still pursuing possible conspiracy angles late into his investigation. Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort was revealed to have lied about sharing polling data with an associate with alleged ties to Russian intelligence, and a top Mueller team lawyer said the episode went “very much to the heart of what the Special Counsel’s Office is investigating.”
Longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone was also recently indicted on charges related to his outreach to WikiLeaks, which disseminated documents the Russians had hacked. His indictment said “a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE,” which was a curious and unusual use of the passive voice that didn’t indicate who did the directing. There was plenty of thought that person might be Trump himself. Trump denied it was.
Ultimately, though, Mueller didn’t charge Stone or Manafort with conspiracy, even as he charged them with other crimes. Now, it appears he won’t be indicting anyone else within Trump’s inner circle.
It’s worth noting that collusion (which is a blanket term Mueller’s team has used for a number of different types of conspiracy) is a crime that’s very difficult to prove. And even the publicly known links between the Trump campaign and Russia have been somewhat tenuous, as Philip Bump has rightly emphasized for months and months.
Which brings us to Trump. According to existing Justice Department guidelines, a sitting president cannot be indicted. So the fact that Mueller isn’t indicting Trump tells us nothing about his conclusions about the president personally. But the fact that none of his campaign aides or advisers are going to be charged with conspiracy does suggest Trump won’t be accused either.
Trump could still theoretically have collusion-related problems, particularly if (a) Trump himself directly colluded or (b) someone else having colluded on his behalf but for some reason is not being charged with it. Perhaps they cooperated and got leniency, for example. Or perhaps Trump publicly asking Russia to steal more of Hillary Clinton’s emails could amount to collusion by itself. It’s possible, but it seems unlikely.
So in that way, Trump and his supporters can rightly be encouraged by the news Friday.
It does not mean, however, that Trump is out of the woods. For all the focus on collusion, it was never the most problematic aspect of Mueller’s investigation for Trump personally. The collusion narrative was the sexiest one for the media to cover (and the one Trump pushed), but obstruction of justice was always the more likely crime Trump had committed. Friday’s news tells us next to nothing about whether Trump’s myriad questionable actions vis-a-vis the Russia probe, starting with firing James B. Comey as FBI director, might yet land him in hot water. Mueller’s probe has also sprouted other probes in which Trump has been implicated (but not directly accused of criminal activity) in Michael Cohen’s campaign finances violations, and also in which Trump’s finances and entities are being scrutinized.
Trump, to his strategic credit, kept the focus on “NO COLLUSION” throughout, perhaps knowing it was unlikely it would ever be proven and that the lack of proof could then be used to undermine whatever else Mueller finds on him. "They didn’t find collusion, so they looked for a bunch of other stuff," is already an argument the Trump team has been making. And given the intense focus on the topic, it’s important to emphasize how much Friday’s news indicates Trump was probably right — at least in Mueller’s eyes.
But it’s also worth noting that Trump doesn’t seem to be celebrating quite yet. In fact, he’s been very quiet. Perhaps that’s because he’s decided to let other people draw these conclusions rather than step on his own good news. Or perhaps it’s because he knows this is hardly the end of his troubles.